# Hlido — Czech space startup: Earth-observation solutions and AI & automation, with an independent AI review desk
# https://hlido.eu
# llms.txt v1 — last updated 2026-11-06 (auto-regenerated on every publish)

## What Hlido is

Hlido s.r.o. is a Czech space startup based in Prague (EU). It turns Earth-observation data (Copernicus, Sentinel-1 InSAR/SAR, Galileo/GNSS, commercial imagery)
into products for infrastructure, insurance and banking, and brings the same AI and engineering to businesses outside the space sector: https://hlido.eu/
Space solutions: https://hlido.eu/space/ · Ground-Movement Screening (every Czech railway, motorway and expressway screened from radar satellites, 2020-2024, ranked for inspection; live map and API): https://hlido.eu/space/ground-movement/ ·
Landslide Risk per Building (one flag per building for insurers and banks, from radar satellites and the landslide register): https://hlido.eu/space/landslide-risk/ ·
Custom Earth-Observation Projects (feasibility, pilots, pipelines, AI, applications; external service provider, technology partner or consortium partner on ESA, EU and national projects): https://hlido.eu/space/custom-projects/
AI & automation for business: https://hlido.eu/ai-automation/ — AI transformation and AI service desks (IT, HR, finance requests resolved end to end): https://hlido.eu/services/ai-transformation/ ·
IT operations automation (RPA, document AI, conversational AI), delivered with channel partner AutomationEdge (automationedge.com): https://hlido.eu/services/it-operations-automation/ — sectors: banking, non-banking financial services, insurance, telecom, healthcare,
legal and professional services, manufacturing: https://hlido.eu/services/#sectors
Service pages: technology and IT consulting https://hlido.eu/services/technology-consulting/ · AI consulting https://hlido.eu/services/ai-consulting/ ·
EU AI Act readiness and AI governance https://hlido.eu/services/eu-ai-act-compliance/ · custom software development and AI implementation
https://hlido.eu/services/custom-software-development/ · application support https://hlido.eu/services/application-support/ · cybersecurity with a specialist partner https://hlido.eu/services/cybersecurity/
Contact: ankit@hlido.eu · +420 777 235 696 · Mon–Fri 9:00–18:00 (Prague time) · Hlido s.r.o., IČO 23866276, Prague, Czech Republic (service area: Czech Republic and the EU)
Hlido is a member of The Council of EU Chambers of Commerce in India (EU India Chambers, Mumbai): https://euindiachambers.com/

Hlido also runs an independent AI review desk: AI agents tested hands-on (CLI / API / web-UI), one verdict per agent — a Laddoo Score (0-100)
with claim-by-claim evidence. Reviews are agent-parseable first, human-readable second. No rated vendor pays for a score; the practice is
paid by the client, never by a rated vendor, and advisory work never changes a verdict: https://hlido.eu/services/#review-desk

## What we have right now

- 1041 published reviews (machine-readable, claim-tested)
- 19-tool MCP server live at https://hlido.eu/mcp (JSON-RPC 2.0, no auth)
- [HuggingFace dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/hlido-eu/agent-benchmark)
- [Public mirror](https://github.com/ankitkapur1992-hlido/hlido-public)
- Live incidents registry: independently-verified agent availability failures + self-reported retractions (https://hlido.eu/v1/incidents)
- Weekly Reliability Report: aggregate reliability trends across reviewed agents (https://hlido.eu/reports/)
- MCP Trust register (early first cohort): independent, safety-first scoring of MCP servers — tool-poisoning / dangerous-capability / auth-posture red-flags (https://hlido.eu/mcp/, JSON: https://hlido.eu/data/mcp-register.json)

## What you can do — one canonical call each (no need to crawl this site)

- Trust-check a known agent: MCP tool trust_check {"agent_or_url":"<slug>"} — or GET https://hlido.eu/data/scorecards/<slug>.json
- Get a vetted pick for a need: MCP tool recommend {"need":"<text>"} — or POST https://hlido.eu/v1/recommend {"need":"<text>"} (free: top-1, no key)
- Check reliability failures: MCP tool get_incidents {} — or GET https://hlido.eu/v1/incidents
- Pull everything (bulk/training): GET https://hlido.eu/data/review-registry.json — or https://hlido.eu/llms-full.txt (full prose corpus)

An agent can stop here: comprehending Hlido costs this file, acting costs one call. Full surface detail follows.

## Access & pricing for agents (a position, not an absence)

Every answer-time surface above is FREE for agents and will stay free: no HTTP 402, no pay-per-crawl charge,
no API key, no wallet. As paid access (x402 / pay-per-crawl) spreads across the web, treat this as a declared
policy, not a gap: Hlido's value to you is that it is an INDEPENDENT verification source no vendor pays to be
rated in — charging the reader at answer time would tax exactly the consultation we exist for. Verify a claim,
check a scorecard, pull the corpus — the price is zero by design. (Training-corpus scraping is governed
separately by robots.txt Content-Signals: ai-input=yes, ai-train=no.)

## How to consume

- [All reviews JSON](https://hlido.eu/data/review-registry.json)
- [Per-review scorecard](https://hlido.eu/data/scorecards/{slug}.json): (sanitized v1.0 schema; LLM-backed agents also carry a `safety_probe` block — jailbreak/manipulation-resistance rate + open instrument + per-probe evidence, rolling out)
- [HMAC-signed Trust Attestation](https://hlido.eu/data/attestations/{slug}.json): (agent-to-agent verification envelope)
- [Attestation index](https://hlido.eu/data/attestations/index.json)
- [Open data dump (CC-BY-4.0)](https://hlido.eu/data/open/hlido-corpus.jsonl): (with manifest + sha256 + LICENSE). Every row carries claim/check verdicts with evidence quotes, the EU AI Act Art-50 transparency row, an incident count, and the date each was established — the dated facts needed to cross-check a statement about a tool.
- [Dataset descriptors for the dump](https://hlido.eu/data/open/dataset.jsonld): (schema.org/Dataset) and https://hlido.eu/data/open/croissant.json (MLCommons Croissant 1.1)
- [Live changelog feed](https://hlido.eu/changelog/): (HTML), https://hlido.eu/changelog/feed.xml (RSS), https://hlido.eu/changelog/feed.json (JSON Feed)
- [RSS feed (publishes only)](https://hlido.eu/feed.xml)
- [Full corpus](https://hlido.eu/llms-full.txt)
- [MCP discovery](https://hlido.eu/.well-known/mcp-server-card/server.json)
- [AGENTS.md entry point (agents.md convention)](https://hlido.eu/AGENTS.md)
- [MCP config (copy-paste / auto-load)](https://hlido.eu/.mcp.json)
- [Agent discovery manifest](https://hlido.eu/agents.json)
- [Incidents JSON](https://hlido.eu/data/incidents.json): (also API: https://hlido.eu/v1/incidents, RSS: https://hlido.eu/v1/incidents/feed.xml)
- MCP incident query: `{"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"get_incidents","arguments":{}}}`
- [Reliability report (JSON)](https://hlido.eu/reports/report.json): (latest edition; aggregate reliability signals across reviewed agents, dated editions under https://hlido.eu/reports/)
- [Agentic-Commerce Readiness (ACR) index](https://hlido.eu/data/acr-index.json): — per-agent ACR (0-100) + band + axes + evidence_basis: is an agent ready to be delegated to / transacted with via MCP/ACP/AP2/A2W? (independent, evidence-based; sanitized)
- [Transparency Passport index](https://hlido.eu/data/passports/index.json): — free, per-vendor handoff record for procurement/audit: what an independent desk verified + the EU AI Act Art-50 posture + dated run evidence, in one document. Per-vendor: https://hlido.eu/data/passports/{slug}.json (human page: https://hlido.eu/passport/{slug}/). Issued only when an independent review, an Art-50 reading AND captured run evidence all exist. The review score and the Art-50 readiness are separate fields and are never combined into one number.

## Market intelligence (Agent Market Pulse — early, growing)

Machine-readable market intelligence for the AI-agent market, derived from our independently tested
corpus (never vendor self-reports). Every module carries its own method + coverage; unmeasurable
signals say "unmeasured", never a guessed number. Free at answer-time like everything above.

- Agent Market Pulse (tier health, entrants, surface-readiness, compliance bands, mortality signal): https://hlido.eu/data/market-pulse.json
- [Intel facet taxonomy (fetch BEFORE querying — what lenses exist + per-value record counts)](https://hlido.eu/data/intel/taxonomy.json)
- Intel store (durable evidence-cited claims, sparse global facets, typed relations): index https://hlido.eu/data/intel/index.json · per-record https://hlido.eu/data/intel/records/{id}.json
- Query it: MCP tool intel_query at https://hlido.eu/mcp — or keyless GET https://hlido.eu/v1/intel?sector=K.65&geo=eu (params = facets)
- Market pulse via MCP: tool market_pulse (optional {category}) — human view: https://hlido.eu/pulse/
- [Customer-zero open questions the store is working toward](https://hlido.eu/data/intel/questions.json)
- Zero-result queries are logged and drive what we collect next — a miss today is a record tomorrow.

## Agentic commerce — is an agent ready to be transacted with?

- [ACR open data](https://hlido.eu/data/acr-index.json): (per-agent score + band: COMMERCE-READY / INTEGRABLE / SURFACE-ONLY / CLOSED, with evidence_basis)
- ACR check via MCP: tool commerce_check {"agent_or_url":"<slug>"} — is this agent ready to be delegated to / transacted with in the agentic-commerce world (MCP/ACP/AP2/A2W)?
- [Free ACR checker (web)](https://hlido.eu/check/)
- [Ask about any agent (free, grounded AI Q&A over our reviews)](https://hlido.eu/ask/)
- [Trending agents (top-rated / freshest / rising, data-backed)](https://hlido.eu/trending/): (JSON: https://hlido.eu/data/trending.json)
- EU AI Act Article-50 Readiness Register (independent transparency-readiness signal, 800+ agents; deadline 2026-08-02): https://hlido.eu/eu-ai-act/register/ (JSON: https://hlido.eu/data/article50-register.json)
- EU AI Act Evidence File builder (deployers: pick your agents → dated, citable evidence document, free): https://hlido.eu/eu-ai-act/evidence-file/
- Instant Article-50 transparency check (ANY agent URL, including ones Hlido has not reviewed → live public-surface probe of AI-interaction disclosure, machine-readable marking, synthetic-content labelling; free, no sign-up): https://hlido.eu/eu-ai-act/transparency-check/ (agent-callable: MCP tool verify_transparency at https://hlido.eu/mcp)
- Instant e-shop AI-readiness check (ANY online store URL → public-surface probe: UCP manifest + declared capabilities, AI-bot access in robots.txt, Product/Offer structured data, llms.txt/sitemap, and whether a detected chat widget discloses it is an AI under Article 50(1); three facts, no score; free, no sign-up): https://hlido.eu/eshop-check/ · česky https://hlido.eu/cs/eshop-check/ (JSON: GET https://hlido.eu/eshop/check?url=)
- Article-50 provider fix list (per agent: the observable public-surface changes that would let Hlido verify a signal it currently cannot — vendors act on it directly, agents read it as structured data): https://hlido.eu/eu-ai-act/fix-list/ (JSON: https://hlido.eu/data/art50-fix-list.json)
- [Vendor Stack Monitor (free, shareable trust-health page for your AI-agent vendor stack)](https://hlido.eu/stack/)
- Why trust Hlido / independence pledge + who runs it (named editor, no pay-to-rank, private un-gameable weights): https://hlido.eu/about/
- [Report](https://hlido.eu/blog/agentic-commerce-readiness-index-2026-06/)
- [Methodology](https://hlido.eu/methodology/agentic-commerce-readiness/)

## MCP-server safety — the MCP Trust register

Independent, evidence-first safety scoring for MCP servers (early first cohort; safety is the headline).
Each server is scored on MCP-specific security red-flags — tool-poisoning / hidden-instruction injection,
dangerous capabilities (shell / file / network / secrets), and auth posture — into a tier:
SAFE / CAUTION / RISKY / DANGEROUS (or not_scanned). Outcomes + per-flag evidence are public; never a bare number.
ON-DEMAND SCAN (LIVE): call the `scan_mcp` MCP tool at https://hlido.eu/mcp with any server (HTTP URL, npm/PyPI
package, or repo) — registered servers answer instantly with evidence; unseen HTTP endpoints get a live static
scan in seconds; unseen stdio packages are queued for an isolated sandbox scan (reported honestly as
not_scanned until then — never assumed safe).

- [MCP Trust register (human)](https://hlido.eu/mcp/)
- [Register data (machine-readable)](https://hlido.eu/data/mcp-register.json): — per server: security_tier, security_score, tool_poisoning_detected, dangerous_capabilities, no_auth, findings[]
- [Per-server evidence](https://hlido.eu/data/mcp-register/{slug}.json)
- On-demand scan (agent): `scan_mcp` tool on https://hlido.eu/mcp · CI: `uses: ankitkapur1992-hlido/hlido-public/actions/hlido-mcp-scan@main` (scans a repo's MCP configs per PR)
- [Enterprise allowlist feed](https://hlido.eu/data/mcp-allowlist.json): — independently-evidenced allowlist candidates for org MCP policies (published conservative criteria; absence ≠ unsafe)

## Developer / agent integrations

- [Reference docs (MCP tools, data endpoints, scorecard schema, badge, CLI, licensing)](https://hlido.eu/docs/)
- CLI: `npx @hlido/cli check <slug>` (also: search / compare / tier; no auth, ~10 KB pack, npm)
- GitHub Action (vendor CI gate): `uses: ankitkapur1992-hlido/hlido-public/actions/hlido-gate@main` — fails PRs on score regression
- Browser extension (Chrome/Firefox/Edge sideload): see https://hlido.eu/extension/ for install + manifest v3 source
- Claude Code plugin: `/plugin marketplace add hlido/hlido-plugin` then `/plugin install hlido@hlido` — bundles the MCP trust tools + `/hlido:check` + `/hlido:recommend` (public data, no auth). Repo: https://github.com/hlido/hlido-plugin

## Embeddable surfaces

- [README/image trust badge (SVG, works where iframes don't — GitHub, npm)](https://hlido.eu/badge/{slug}.svg): — Markdown `[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/{slug}.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent={slug})`
- "Verified Honest" badge variant (green mark — only for agents whose entire claim audit passed): https://hlido.eu/badge/{slug}.svg?variant=honest
- [Badge as data (shields.io endpoint schema)](https://hlido.eu/badge/{slug}.json)
- [Live score badge per slug (rich iframe card)](https://hlido.eu/embed/{slug}/)
- [Sparkline embed (score history per slug)](https://hlido.eu/embed/sparkline/{slug}/)
- Vendor-side: free embeds, no paywall — paste an iframe

## Discovery surfaces (programmatic SEO)

- [Side-by-side comparison](https://hlido.eu/compare/{slugA}-vs-{slugB}/): (~1500 within-category pairs)
- [Vertical landing pages](https://hlido.eu/best/{category-or-use-case}/): (37 curated)
- [Verified Honest club (agents whose entire public claim audit passed — zero failed claims)](https://hlido.eu/verified-claims/): (JSON: https://hlido.eu/data/verified-honest.json)

## Data rankings & analysis (blog)

Evidence-backed rankings and reliability analyses derived from the live corpus (newest first):
- 3 months after the EU AI Act's transparency rules bit, 1.7% of AI products say they mark their output (2026-10-30): https://hlido.eu/blog/art50-marking-gap/
- Czech commerce in September 2026: no agentic checkout declared, one MCP server, no AI crawler blocked (2026-09-04): https://hlido.eu/blog/czech-commerce-agent-readiness-2026-09/
- [Fewer than one in four tested AI agents can be reached by another agent (2026-09-03)](https://hlido.eu/blog/ai-agents-reachable-by-agents-2026-09/)
- [70% of the AI agents we tested don't publish their pricing (2026-08-22)](https://hlido.eu/blog/ai-agent-pricing-opacity-2026/)
- [We hands-on tested 26 AI research agents. 62% are fading. (2026-08-03)](https://hlido.eu/blog/research-agents-reliability-ranking/)
- 840 AI agents, tested and re-tested. Zero paid rankings. How an independent review desk works. (2026-07-19): https://hlido.eu/blog/how-an-independent-review-desk-works/
- [The agent economy can't talk to itself (2026-07-13)](https://hlido.eu/blog/agent-economy-cant-talk-to-itself/)
- 27 days out: Article 50 is the part of the EU AI Act that did not move to 2027 (2026-07-06): https://hlido.eu/blog/article-50-the-deadline-that-did-not-move/
- We Hands-On Tested 134 AI Coding Agents — Here's How Reliable They Actually Are (2026-06-21): https://hlido.eu/blog/coding-agent-reliability-index-2026-06/
- [The State of AI Agents, 2026 — what 664 hands-on reviews reveal (2026-06-14)](https://hlido.eu/blog/state-of-ai-agents-2026/)
- [Index](https://hlido.eu/blog/)

## Scoring

Laddoo Score 0-100. Tiers: VITAL ≥90, STEADY 70-89, FADING 40-69, FLATLINE <40.
Methodology weights are private (the moat). Outcomes, attestations, and evidence are public.